{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Publication trimestrielle sur la r\u00e8glementation de l\u2019\u00e9nergie","provider_url":"https:\/\/energyregulationquarterly.ca\/fr","title":"Rejet de la fusion : Le bon sens de Washington - Publication trimestrielle sur la r\u00e8glementation de l\u2019\u00e9nergie","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lYnOOqpBoM\"><a href=\"https:\/\/energyregulationquarterly.ca\/fr\/articles\/merger-rejected-common-sense-from-washington\">Rejet de la fusion : Le bon sens de Washington<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/energyregulationquarterly.ca\/fr\/articles\/merger-rejected-common-sense-from-washington\/embed#?secret=lYnOOqpBoM\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00ab\u00a0Rejet de la fusion : Le bon sens de Washington\u00a0\u00bb &#8212; Publication trimestrielle sur la r\u00e8glementation de l\u2019\u00e9nergie\" data-secret=\"lYnOOqpBoM\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/energyregulationquarterly.ca\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","description":"Il est question de l\u2019\u00c9tat de Washington dans le pr\u00e9sent cas. La Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission a rejet\u00e9 le projet d\u2019acquisition d\u2019Avista (anciennement Washington Water Power) par Hydro One, le service public contr\u00f4l\u00e9 par le gouvernement de l\u2019Ontario, au Canada. L\u2019ordonnance de d\u00e9cembre 2018 de la Commission soulignait deux probl\u00e8mes[...]"}